Logopedia:Requests for adminship

Oppose

 * You currently don't have enough contributions to become an admin yet. So at this point, you need to edit more and help out before you can become an administrator.--Muzzarino 22:37, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * It took me less than two months on Logopedia to get a thousand edits, so if you keep editing on a weekly/daily basis, you can get there (and, for future reference, please sign your comments as well). NewYorkCity101 (talk) 04:48, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
 * we have enough admins to sustain a wikia like this. --sans the lazy skeleton (talk • edits) 18:00, September 9, 2017 (UTC)

Comments
But how can I reach 1000 edits quickly? I sometimes get inactive due to some reasons.
 * idk probably edit more. i mean, this wiki has enough admins for now. --sans the lazy skeleton (talk • edits) 17:59, September 9, 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

 * According to the criteria, you need 1000 or more edits and you don't have enough contributions to become an administrator on this wiki, so I might need to disagree with this request.--Muzzarino 00:43, July 26, 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with Muzzarino on this because of your edit count, but do not get discouraged. However, I am completely with you about the amount of vandals here, which is why I wanted to become an administrator. So keep up the good work and one day you will hopefully join the admins. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 14:47, July 28, 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * You did great work adding some good logos and dueling against bad contributors. For helping out do all that, you deserve to be an administrator on the wiki.--Muzzarino 21:42, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
 * You have uploaded some of the best logos that I have seen on Logopedia (and you wonder why I keep coming to you for help ;)). I really believe, like I said, that you will do great as an administrator. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 16:20, September 10, 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

 * i'm afraid i'll have to oppose. we have too many admins atm. if you want, you could sign up for rollback instead. --sans the lazy skeleton (talk • edits) 13:01, September 10, 2017 (UTC)

Comments
=Inactive requests for adminship=

MindsEyeTHPS
Talk · Contributions · All logs · [ Block log] · Upload log · [ User Rights log] I have been contributing alot. I've been adding never-before-seen variants of logos, adding pages for various other companies, and helping kill off vandalism and gibberish. I also have been reporting users of bogus behavior and sockpupperty. I was even adding full dates and in-depth explanation of the logos, so that when people come to see them, they will know when the changes exactly happened. MindsEyeTHPS (talk) 20:56, April 9, 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * I agree with this. With all the hard work you've done to fight out troublesome users, I'm giving this a positive vote.
 * I am completely with you about the sockpuppets. I have seen you around Logopedia making constructive edits, so I can see you being a good admin. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 14:50, July 28, 2017 (UTC)

Crazy Muzzarino
Talk · Contributions · All logs · [ Block log] · Upload log · [ User Rights log]

After waiting 6 months to request administrative rights from the month of getting rollback, I'm deciding to request to be an administrator for good work on contributing to the wiki by adding logos that have never been on Logopedia before.--Muzzarino 10:49, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * I completely agree. I have seen you edit regularly and taking care of vandals the best you can. You truly deserve to be an administrator. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 11:31, January 13, 2017 (UTC)

Final Decision
✅

NewYorkCity101
Talk · Contributions · All logs · [ Block log] · Upload log · [ User Rights log]

I would like to nominate this user as an Administrator. He has accumulated enough edits to be eligible, has a clean slate, and is rather passionate about protecting this site from vandals. He might be a great asset to this website.

21:26, October 4, 2016 (UTC)

Support

 * I agree, he's been fighting vandalism and helping out add new logos here.Muzzarino 21:34, October 4, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

 * Logovis, thank you so much for the nomination last week, I truly feel honored by this nomination and cannot be more thankful. I would like to mention a couple things that I would do as an administrator. What was said about what I do is completely true. I come to Logopedia at least once a day to make some edits to improve it. My harsh feelings towards vandals comes from a personal moral that it is wrong to just mess up people's work for one's own benefit; I try not to go overboard though. Also, I have attempted to start a couple forums about certain issues on Logopedia that need to be fixed. As an administrator, I will continue to perform these tasks and use my new abilities as one appropriately. Aside from the issues, I would like to compliment this site because Logopedia is truly a remarkable wiki that can be very informative with logo history and I am thrilled to be a part of it. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 21:41, October 14, 2016 (UTC)

Final Decision
✅

Oppose

 * I think you are a sockpuppet of Alberte919, so I don't think you deserve adminship.--Muzzarino 07:42, April 23, 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

 * You have 36 edits, which cannot be fitted for Admin. You need 2,000 or 3,000 edits to make yourself admin. Also, you talk to people which is blocked, which might make you a sockpuppet to others. Sorry! Famouslogos9098 (talk) 01:26, April 19, 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * Congradulations on your hardwork catching vandals in acts. I would agree that you should be an admin.Muzzarino 23:24, August 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help that day dealing with that vandal. I appreciate it and truly agree that you deserve the right to be an administrator. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 02:11, October 5, 2016 (UTC)