110,404 Pages

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.



Has anyone noticed that the bulk of images here are stuff User:Augi2000 added here for no reason? The Viacom logos here are some examples. What should we do with them? Logovis (talk) 20:37, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

I believe that the pony club should not be deleted as it is real, google it if you disagree.

Nelvana Entertainment Should not be deleted

Nelvana Entertainment is a wikia website create by me Quenya McField aka Kudiz its a website that shows tv shows and i creates my own logos this website is not fake and the logo are real so will you please just click on the 2 link i will give you to prove that the website is real and the logos ( all created by me are real ) and i that should be enough proof!

For The webpage See http://nelvana-entertainment.wikia.com/wiki/Nelvana_Entertainment_Wiki

For the logos See  http://nelvana-entertainment.wikia.com/wiki/Nelvana_Entertainment_(_Wiki_)

Um, excuse me sir, but these are FAKE. YouTubeFan43 (talk) 20:29, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Click here for the real logos. YouTubeFan43 (talk) 20:32, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Stud Style Productions

Trying 2 find out y my page Is up for deletion. Someone has changed my pic.. Then logo said I'm spaming.. I've had this page for 3 yes.   

That's because you are spamming. VSTF just asked me to look at your edits.  Digifiend  Talk  PR/SS  KR  MH  Toku  JD  Garo  TH  CG  UM  Logos  CLG  DW  13:38, 23/1/2015 

I Have Triple Deletions To Do With

Here Are The Following :

File:Chrome.jpg File:Unable-to-connect.jpg File:Google-Chrome-28-network-error-3-.png

These Are Errors Not Logos But We Can Do it With Attention.

- BMSign.jpg Bryant Maquito (talk) 10:33, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

All three files and the page they were on have been deleted, thanks!  Digifiend  Talk  PR/SS  KR  MH  Toku  JD  Garo  TH  CG  UM  Logos  CLG  DW  16:59, 15/3/2015 

Why is "Defunct television networks in the United States" being deleted?

Can somebody please answer me? Darkwing Brony (talk) 01:06, June 3, 2015 (UTC)Darkwing Brony


I don't found any reason why this need to delete. The station exist and currently is broadcasting SBN. Can anyone keep this article?--LTSC1980 (talk) 09:44, July 11, 2015 (UTC)

Mr.Tickety-Toc Clock is not fake he's real

I believe Mr.Tickety-Toc Clock page should not be deleted. It is a real chilren's book. It's acctually new, bur everyone loves the red twin-belled cartoon clock. If you believe he's not real, you can search him up on amazon. He was written and illustrated by and 11 year old kid who recently gave back to the childrens hospital! his website is davonmiller.wix.com/itstimeotread. Please, please don't delete that page. I bet it would mean alot to him. Barneymiller123abc (talk) 11:02, August 8, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but United is right. Nonetheless, the evidence ruling the page fake must be that the cloud background was either done in MS Paint or Microsoft Excel, and after he's seen enough, I've added the delete tag back. --Robertnvabeach (talk) 16:46, August 8, 2015 (UTC)

The new BBC Two logo is a real concept

I've unveiled the logo for the refresh BBC Two and it's part of the official Youtube concept here: [[1]].

It was intended to be a real logo that I've unveiled. WilliamRocheGuilty1 (talk) 12:23, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

First off, this was not a real logo. Second off, the BBC 2 logo from 2007 still remains. It will not go anywhere as of January 1, 2015. --Robertnvabeach (talk) 17:31, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Disney Kids

How is Disney Kids still up? That page should had been deled along time ago. Darkwing Brony (talk) 21:13, October 13, 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why this page should've been deleted a long time ago but was still there, either, but I requested an admin, and he will finally delete this page to make sure it will not stay up there anymore. --Robertnvabeach (talk) 21:22, October 13, 2015 (UTC)

Do Not Delete the "DAA Channel" Page!

I Just worked almost 15 Minutes on that page! Please! I object to you deleting my Page! PLEASE! Kaden13 (talk) 01:07, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but if I were to bring it back, I'd either be in big trouble or in a good mark. I'm going to talk to an administrator, and if he agrees that all the info is fake (logos and page included), he'll delete it and all the logos that were made since that, and block you, but if he says that it is real, he'll restore the page, bring back the logos that were made since that, you'd be safe, and I will remove the report on the Logopedia's User Reports, but for now, I'm going to put this deletion on hold by conferencing with an administrator. --Robertnvabeach (talk) 01:12, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

EmanE Games should not be deleted

EmanE Games is a website where you can download PowerPoint games created by me Ethan Canne These logos are real and if you still don't belive me please press this links below to view my webiste and to see the logos.  And I do get traffic on my website so I don't see why it should be deleted.  Emanegames (talk) 18:46, October 20, 2015 (UTC)

For the Website see  EmanE Games

For the logos click here EmanE Games History

That's false. EmanE Games is a fake on the ruling of Policy since creation of the fan-made website by you will not be allowed immediately, and I will not even touch the website nor the logo history either even if I don't believe you, and, since Logofanatic saw the video of you being underage, I'd suggest let EmanE Games be deleted and I'd suggest that you will be blocked as a sockpuppet, and better yet, this will be your very first sockpuppet account block made just for an underage user. See you real soon, Emane! --Robertnvabeach (talk) 20:29, October 20, 2015 (UTC)
Oh, and one more thing, your preceding user, Emane89, will extend his block from the day he turns 13 into a life block due to issues with sockpuppetry. As stated above, I see why EmanE Games should be deleted, and I also see why you should be blocked with him due to sockpuppetry. Once again, I will not touch the website nor the logo history at all since you are way too underage to edit (aged 10). --Robertnvabeach (talk) 20:55, October 20, 2015 (UTC)
That is not true I am 14 years old my birthday is august 29 2001 why do you think I am 10?  Emanegames (talk) 21:25, October 20, 2015 (UTC)
I think you're just making the numbers up. Snelfu once told you you've violated Wikia's Terms of Use, and you have been blocked until 2018, and yet, you evaded that block. Your next block: Indefinite for you and your preceding account, Emane89. --Robertnvabeach (talk) 23:14, October 20, 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Im a bit new here, but i think that was a little to harsh and a little too idiotic, im not calling anyone any names, just expressing how i feel, it was a bit too hard on him, and i think you guys need to work it out, no blocking invloved.
Network7 (talk) 23:11, July 29, 2017 (UTC)Network7


Télétoon is going to be a page for the French Teletoon.

Please do not delete it.

Lolcoolname123 (talk) 00:02, October 23, 2015 (UTC)Lolcoolname123

Element Animation/Other should be deleted

This so called ELEMENT ANIMATION and its contents should be deleted because of the following reasons:

1. Logos are fake

2. Not affliated by ABS-CBN

3. There is no Channel 69 on Analog in the Phiilippines

4. There is no Baron Broadcasting Company existing in the Philippines

5. Copyright infringement for editing "ABS-CBN HD" logo.

Admins, please take action of this page. Thank You. Luis.oberio (talk) 00:46, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

The Custom:Main Page page should not be deleted

As all you know, the Custom:Main Page page is made for private use and should not be deleted. If an administrator deletes this page will have his/her adminship revoked and blocked for 3 months. Don't delete the Custom:Main Page page. Neilman102 (talk) 19:20, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

Since fake logos aren't allowed, you've spammed this page to other people who don't want to engage into it. Logopedia is not your place to advertise and make custom logos here. This community belongs to Alxeedo111 and only he has the right to change policies on these stuff. Pretending to be that your in charge will get you blocked here.--Muzzarino 19:25, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
I've deleted it. As you should know Wikia does not have "private use" pages, editors do have their own userpages and can create subpages. Further more Logopedia was set up to provide a history of real logos, it was not set up to provide a database of fakes and custom logos, anyone wishing to do that can start their own wiki. Lastly Neilman102, you are not an admin, and throwing around attempts to get a user blocked that are in accordance with the editing guidelines may lead to your editing right revoked. -- [[ axg //  ]] 21:04, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

NTCG Films shouldn't be deleted.

NTCG Films is REAL, but not incorporate. You just didn't know. go to http://thevistas2004.weebly.com/ntcg-technologiesfilms.html for more info. it's not really YT, they dont have a tv service, they do make home videos and not in stores at all, it's all in the word, INDEPENDENT. They make real shows on the channel nicky the computer guy, but only 1 franchise is completed, which is based off of PINGU, called "Pingu in the House".

NTCGFILMS (talk) 21:48, July 8, 2016 (UTC)

FMA1986, this isn't the right topic...

Hi NTCGFILMS. We are always welcoming of new pages, however the subject of the article must be notable. I tried visiting the URL you provided, however the link seems to be broken. That only leaves the YouTube channel for me to look at, which does not follow the requirement of 10,000+ subscribers. If you can provide me with a functioning URL, I will definitely investigate further and consider restoration of the page. We will be creating a page dedicated to notability guidelines soon that will provide more detail on all of this. Thank you. Alxeedo TALK 22:48, July 8, 2016 (UTC)
NTCGFILMS (talk) 13:44, July 9, 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, alxeedo111. Go check out thevistas2004.weebly.com and then go to the tab that may say "NTCG technologies/films" and for our production, go to pinguinthehouse.weebly.com and the links shouldn't be broken.
I apologize, but at this time I cannot restore the page. I have reasonable suspicion that the logo of the entity (NTCG Films) in question has been taken from elsewhere and modified, which can bring up copyright issues. In addition, this seems to be an instance of self-promotion, which is not permitted (Logopedia is not an advertisement). I hope you can understand, thank you. Alxeedo TALK 22:01, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
NTCGFILMS (talk) 01:11, July 18, 2016 (UTC)
Uhhh, okay. Well, how did you know that? I didn't do that...
Sorry for the delayed response. I apologize for the copyright accusation, I wasn't able to find anything to supplement that and I retract my claim. However, this page still violated our policy regarding self-promotion and notability. While I believe your company has a lot of potential, Logopedia is not the place to be promoting it. There are many other methods of promoting your company that are free and easy to use, this wiki/encyclopedia is not one of them. I am sorry but I cannot restore your page at this time. You are still welcome to contribute in any other constructive manner. Thank you and I hope you can understand. Alxeedo TALK 03:54, July 22, 2016 (UTC)
NTCGFILMS (talk) 16:20, July 22, 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me about this. Do you know any alternatives to logopedia?

Ducktales merchandising not deleted

(FMA1986 (talk) 22:56, July 7, 2016 (UTC)) Ducktales merchandising not deleted!

Why these abusers, edit the page dedicated to the Ducktales merchandising? The page have created myself, and not have to delete it. In addition I have also specified the reference is to merchandising, and both the TV series, which has already been created by someone? FIX IT!

Quite honestly I'm not sure what you're talking about. The page is right here and was never labelled for deletion. My mistake, just looked at the history and saw it was marked for deletion. First off, please do not use an abrasive or harsh tone like you are now, this is not the place for it. Secondly, I saw that you removed the Delete template. This is not permitted, you must leave the template on. Thirdly, it is perfectly fine to protest the page's deletion template, but you must do so civilly. Alxeedo TALK 22:48, July 8, 2016 (UTC)

please do not delete the VIME Indonesia

VIME Indonesia is a first of animation with meme in southeast asia particularly Indonesia. all of that animation is original by VIME indonesia. In indonesia, that's community is the largest and the most integrated in indonesia.

From Imnew7373  said that logo of VIME Indonesia it's illegal, but in the reality they had a lot of vime. if you are not believe it, you can check on VIME Indonesia on Facebook, Youtube, and also had a website.

about the logo, there an original of VIME indonesia on the website. maybe you can not believe me about this, but you can trust me about all of this fact. i hope you to consider about this one. because this fanpages is a largest animation meme community in indonesia

Sorry, but I think it is not mostly known for long. It is almost a fan-page. It is not seen in wikipedia for your notice. P.S You are reported to the User Reports due to this. Imnew7373 (talk) 17:32, July 26, 2016 (UTC) Oh and the channel has less than 10,000 subscribers on the YouTube channel. The channel must have 10,000 to be made at Logopedia. Do not post Youtube channels less than 10,000. Imnew7373 (talk) 17:36, July 26, 2016 (UTC)

I think there is a good case on Rezki's part for keeping VIME indonesia. While it does not meet Logopedia's notability guidelines for YouTube channels, there is an organized website and it has a strong presence on social media, with over 100,000 likes on Facebook alone. I think that this qualifies it for its own page.
However, Rezki, you need to read our editing guidelines and notability guidelines. You are currently not following procedure and this can get you blocked. Please do this before editing any further. Also, as for your other pages (such as RDR Indonesia), they violate the above guidelines and will be deleted unless you can prove their notability. I'm sorry about this, but all content published to Logopedia must follow guidelines. Thank you. Alxeedo TALK 18:17, July 26, 2016 (UTC)

Rede Globo/Indicative Rating

Starting section for the deletion of Rede Globo/Indicative Rating. -- [[ axg //  ]] 21:56, August 11, 2016 (UTC)

Including: Rede Record/Indicatives Ratings, SBT/Indicatives Ratings and TV Cultura/Indicatives Ratings. -- [[ axg //  ]] 15:22, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
Agree with deletion for all four of these articles, they do not provide any additional insight into the logos of their parent pages. Alxeedo TALK 00:54, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Nexstar Station logos

This page is a gallery. All of the logos featured in the gallery have their own pages. At most, this page should be a category, but should not be in mainspace. Alxeedo TALK 00:54, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

I agree 100%. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 05:06, August 18, 2016 (UTC)


An article without a single logo on it does not even belong on Logopedia. NewYorkCity101 (talk) 05:08, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

DWAN is real. DWAN was used to be owned by Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) from 2007 until 2010. But there are no "confirmed logos" of this station until this day. Luis.oberio (talk) 07:31, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

By looking at the history of Yahoo logos over on this website, that is the actual Yahoo logo they've used back then. I would say keep this on Logopedia.Muzzarino 12:53, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

Still it is fake. The Yahoo! wordmark didn't exist til 1996. Mcfaddenskyler (talk to me) 13:20, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
It is real. I've looked that one up on Google and a number of reliable sites have it. If it was fake, then it wouldn't be shown on those websites and it would be one person to make that, not Yahoo!. You need to contact the company with the email address "cc-advoc@yahoo-inc.com" and send them that picture and they'll tell you whether they made it or not in the past.--Muzzarino 13:31, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
I don't know Mcfaddenskyler (talk to me) 13:37, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
I've sent them a message about it. When they get to it sometime, I'll take a look at the email and if they said they have made it in the past, I'll remove the tag from the file page and upload a screenshot of the email to show you the proof of it.--Muzzarino 13:45, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
Ok. Mcfaddenskyler (talk to me) 13:47, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
That Logoblink site is wrong. The purple version of the wordmark is from the 21st century. It always used to be red. Also, it's odd that they'd have a new year logo when they didn't have a regular logo yet. You'd be better off checking Yahoo.com in the Wayback Machine.  Digifiend  Talk  PR/SS  KR  MH  Toku  JD  Garo  TH  CG  UM  Logos  CLG  DW  14:58, 23/8/2016 
There aren't any 1995 revisions of the yahoo page. Those pages and the logo from then are now extinct, but some sites still have the original logo preserved.--Muzzarino 15:10, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
Digifiend I agree. I couldn't find that version of the 1995 logo on Web Archive. It might actually be fake. Mcfaddenskyler (talk to me) 15:17, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
It's extinct.--Muzzarino 15:20, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
Tell me how AxG found the first version if it was extinct. Mcfaddenskyler (talk to me) 15:28, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
He didn't find it, it was found by a user who got the extinct logo from another website.--Muzzarino 15:42, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

BBC Idents

I've just launched my forum website on 2nd September discussing BBC's TV channel idents as with The TV Lounge and i'm considered that it is real. It's interesting to see it and like several of internet forums (e.g. TV Forum), my concept logo of BBC Idents should be kept for foreseeable future.

Thank you! 2InARoom (talk) 12:24, September 3, 2016 (UTC)

Universal Pictures/Other

When I last checked, I just saw that the page ended up getting marked for deletion because the page did not have anything at all. Please, I hope you do NOT delete this page because I was wondering if I could add some on-screen Universal logos to the page. - Masoudfun1996 (talk) 19:28, September 30, 2016 (UTC)


Seriously, why to put some fake logos here in Logopedia? Admins, please delete these type of logos and ban those users. I believe that Logopedia is a wiki for TRUE AND ORIGINAL LOGOS. Thank you. Luis.oberio (talk) 10:32, October 12, 2016 (UTC)

i know if you wanna delete this article, but you must to know about this.

  • ATM BCA is a member of BCA.
  • ATM in your language you can say Automated Teller Machine

this is the original website of ATM BCA


i know in your country isn't popular as like a VISA, or mastercard. but in indonesia is very popular. you can think again before you remove it because in indonesia, BCA is a very popular bank

Rezky dwir 14:27, November 29, 2016 (UTC)rezki2001

If you're referring to me, then i'm not the one who requested the deletion. Instead, it was requested by a "sockpuppet" user Augi2000. But don't worry. I'll revise that page.

Luis.oberio (talk) 02:45, December 3, 2016 (UTC)

Mrs. Brown's Boys

I have already uploaded two actual logos to add to Mrs. Brown's Boys but has deletion template in the page, the reason being stated as "No actual logo and fake?". Would it be fine if I add the logos to the page I linked. Plus, the show isn't fake. -Cindayz45 (talk) 01:50, December 10, 2016 (UTC)


The Windows/Codename page is basically the same as Microsoft Windows/Codename, but linked less.

It's the useful Imp!BF10 Orders TipsPaint Roller has to look at some numbers D'oh! - I dropped some logs! 22:44, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

the roblox 2006 logo what I uploaded

Hi there yesterday somebody reported my file for deletion but my roblox logo is the official one but I cleaned it up a little and made it bigger. Can someone stop the deletion please.

Microsoft Edge

I don't think the Internet Explorer page should be merged with the Microsoft Edge page because Wikipedia doesn't mention them being the same thing, because they aren't the same thing. Tjdrum2000 00:32, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

I also don't think that Internet Explorer should be merged with Microsoft Edge because for 1, IE is still going on, and 2, they were 2 different products, starting and ending at overlapping times. Noahx101 4:00, June 4th, 2017

AXN (Australia and New Zealand), Fox (France), Fox (Romania), Fox Life (UK and Ireland)

The stations' existence can't be verified. There are no sources whatsoever. Just the author's wishful thinking. — Andreyyshore (talk) 10:18, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

The author has removed {{delete}} from the page, just like he has done at the English Wikipedia. I added it back. Disruptive editing is not something that someone who has evidence would do. — Andreyyshore (talk) 04:41, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
Also, User:Fermariarules and User:Sagan Blob Enterprises are the same person using sockpuppets. — Andreyyshore (talk) 07:16, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, protected, blocked. -- [[ axg //  ]] 10:44, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. — Andreyyshore (talk) 09:29, August 13, 2017 (UTC)

DanTDM no deleting!!!

Why are you deleting DanTDM? I kinda like my first page Please do not delete it

This is embarrassing.

It's embarrassing that there are so many fake/non-logos on Logopedia. There are so many obviously fake logos that been up for months. How long does it take for Logopedia to deleted fake logos?Darkwing Brony (talk) 13:58, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

I'm working on removing these right now, thanks for notifying. -Lucky Cash Lucky (talk) 17:29, November 21, 2017 (UTC)

Update March 20, 2018

As of writing this (March 20, 2018), more fake/non-logos had been uploaded to Logopedia. To everyone, please keep up. I don't know why people troll Logopedia, but they do. Darkwing Brony (talk) 15:27, March 20, 2018 (UTC)


This is only five examples of fakes.

DZMB 90.7 Throwback

  • There are two fake logos of DZMB 90.7 before.

CN Toonix Lost Bumpers

The Page Named CN Toonix Lost Bumpers doesn't has anything to do with logos or the wiki, it has something to do with lost and found content like in lost media wiki, the creator of this page is Boo1223. And im here to say that this page it should be removed since it doesnt has logos. NewSign.png 21:06, April 7, 2018 (UTC)

Written in Our Stars page.

Please delete the page because it's cancelled/delayed by the company. They're trying to make a TV series on air. --JJBisHere15 (talk) 13:17, May 4, 2018 (UTC)

UniKitty! and Gigantic (Cancelled Film)

Both pages named UniKitty! and Gigantic (Cancelled film) Needs to be deleted because both pages are duplicates of Unikitty! and Gigantic (Disney film) UniKitty has the same name but with the letter K with caps on and Gigantic (Cancelled Film) Needs to be deleted cause i made this page by accident because i didn't know there was already a Gigantic page. So im here saying that UniKitty! and Gigantic (Cancelled Film) needs to be deleted because of being doubles NewSign.png 23:52, May 28, 2018 (UTC)

CyberHax Inc.

This page is genuine and there was no reason for it to be deleted. The logos are Original and real as well. There needs to be an explination as to why it's being deleted please!!

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

The page needs to be deleted because it is fake, at the behind of the logo, the Call of Duty: Black Ops III logo was spotted.

Agri Birds

Just found this page with some information. --"Sezme" (talk) 23:27, October 26, 2018 (UTC) https://angrybirds.fandom.com/wiki/Agri_Birds

Dream Logos Wiki

Why is the "Dream Logos Wiki" page up for deletion when its so called "not notable"?

First of all.. Dream Logos Wiki IS notable. It's a Logopedia fanon.

Even if the page is new, the wiki is popular.


Got to be honest man, I don't really know. I some Logopedia users don't like logos to fan Wikia sites. I personally agree with you. Whatever the case, this topic needs to be debated. Darkwing Brony (talk) 20:21, February 17, 2019 (UTC)

20th Century Fox Television/Other

On the templates it is featured in, it has a red link, and do people really need to have that included on the templates it’s featured in. Please provide a good answer to as why it doesn’t make sense to have a page for its on screen logos.

Warner Bros. on-screen logos

Of course on-screen logos are appropraite here?!  Why make them a deletion candidate?!  That would be a waste!02:43, October 27, 2019 (UTC)Jeff Meredith (talk)

it's ASHAME to have FAKE logos.

can you delete these logos?




and the fake logos from this page:



MetroManilaCity630khz (talk) 07:22, December 11, 2019 (UTC)

"To add a page to this category, type {{delete}} or {{speedydelete}} on the page." -- [[ axg //  ]] 09:27, December 11, 2019 (UTC)

Category: Racism

The category I created for a certain page was a big misunderstanding, why did I do it anyway? Do something about it. Racism makes no sense anyways. Darrion "Beans" Brown (talk) 06:07, January 8, 2020 (UTC)

Several photos

Several screenshots of my discussion questions proving CST's shutdown

I just don't want these screenshots on this page anymore. It was only made for a message wall.

Darrion "Beans" Brown 😃 (talk) 01:55, March 8, 2020 (UTC)

Baby Lamb Creations/Baby Lamb & Friends should not be deleted! 

I strongly disagree that the article on the Baby Lamb Creations YouTube channel (and the one on its web series "Baby Lamb & Friends") should be deleted, especially just simply because of the amount of subscribers it has. It says that the channel only has 69,500 subscribers and therefore does not meet the criteria set forth in the Notability Guidelines to have its own article on Logopedia.

I checked the Notability Guidelines and it says that an online channel must have at least 1,000,000 subscribers to have its own article. However, I have checked the other channels on Logopedia and noticed that a lot of them on the same category have less than a million subscribers (and even few of them have less than 100,000 subscribers like Baby Lamb Creations) but they're still up. Some examples include RebelTaxi (442,000 subs), Front Page tech (23,000 subscribers), Kids Learning tube (746,000 subscribers), all of which have less than a million but over 100,000. Other examples include Hilmymakarim (which has 36,600 subscribers, less than half of how many subscribers Baby Lamb Creations has), Joseph Scarbrough Puppet Productions (which has 299 subscribers), and guitan11, the channel that uploads Stickman Can't Fight (animation series) (which stands at 82,900 subscribiers). All of those channels have less subscribers than Baby Lamb Creations but have pages for their respective logos on this Wiki site. 

Baby Lamb Creations is a successful YouTube channel that has up to millions of views and has developed a fanbase. It's acknowledged on the Wikitubia, receives thousands of likes on their videos, and so I feel like it is very worthy of attention on this website. BLambClammy (talk) 22:12, May 27, 2020 (UTC)

  • The notability guidelines say that the channels must have at least 100,000,000 (1 million) subscribers, not 1,000 (one thousand) or 10,000 (ten thousand). These people have created the pages without reading the notability guidelines (I checked all of the channels you mentioned and they all don't have 1M subs so I marked them for deletion). TRG9009.png• (Wanna talk?)•(See what I've done over the years!) 11:06, June 8, 2020 (UTC)
Those channels like the JSPP posted earlier might have popularity based on how much videos fans love and has posted in it's channel and though this was official, but the problem is that some subs might have their channel terminated. I guess I'd say delete it then unless it can get more than 1 million subscribers.--Muzzarino 11:14, June 8, 2020 (UTC)

Don’t delete the <ftp/> picture thing

I have changed the <ftp/> thing to the Fandom logo with no Fandom icon. Misc544 (talk) 21:43, June 22, 2020 (UTC)

Photo Video; no reason to delete

To quote: "This article should be speedily deleted for the following reason: Fake logo."

Has it not already been established that it was (at some point) a real company - especially as the addresses on both appear to be actual places? Rj4712 (talk) 17:26, August 18, 2020 (UTC)


The Kookaburra page I made was labeled as a candidate for deletion because it is apparently unknown and possibly fake.Here is a link to the comapanies website, where the logo can be seen . This template should be removed.

OrangeGoose (talk) 10:46, August 20, 2020 (UTC)



this channel was known at least on youtube, it has 14000 subs, so regardless of its number of subs, identchannel already had a history maing 10 years online and it deserves to have a logopedia page.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.