Logopedia
Advertisement
Logopedia Requests Report User 2G
Logopedia Requests Page Protection 2G
Logopedia Requests Deletion 2G
Logopedia Requests Slider Montage 2G
Logopedia Requests SVG 2G
Logopedia Requests Article 2G
Logopedia Requests Other 2G
Logopedia Requests Rollback 2G
Logopedia Requests Adminship 2
Logopedia Requests Bureaucratship 2G
Welcome to Logopedia's Requests for adminship. If you are considering requesting to become an administrator, you must read the Note below. Please see the Instructions section for guidance on how to request.

Note to Requesters[]

Becoming an administrator is a big responsibility. Administrators work very hard to maintain Logopedia and keep it running. This is not something that is handed out frequently or without thought. Only the most trustworthy, active, and knowledgeable users are granted adminship. For more insight into what this means and what it requires, please continue reading.

Before you continue, please read the entirety of the administrators page. You must know the ins and outs of being an administrator before requesting to be one. Administrators have a lot of power, and thereby have significant responsibility. If you do not think you will be able to properly handle that power and make responsible decisions, this is not for you.

I know I can handle being an administrator. What are the requirements to becoming one?
While bureaucrats do have some flexibility in deciding who becomes an administrator, there are a set of base guidelines that they look for in reviewing requests:

  • User is able to communicate in a near-native fluency of English.
  • User has been editing on Logopedia for at least one full year.
  • User has not been blocked within the past year of editing. Users who were blocked by hackers, administrator abuse, or blocked for only one day will not have their blocks count as an offense.
  • User has not previously requested for adminship within the past 6 months.
  • User has proven knowledge of Logopedia and its policies. This means that they follow editing guidelines, they fix and improve pages, they upload high quality logos and follow copyright rules, etc.
  • User is active in fighting vandalism, sockpuppetry, and policy-breakers. This means that their editing history provides evidence of assisting administrators (i.e. editing talk pages of admins to alert them of destructive users), reporting users, and undoing/rollbacking poor or nonconstructive edits.
  • User is an autoconfirmed, active, constructive editor. If you are applying here, you must have at least 1000+ edits.

I satisfy (or mostly satisfy) all of the above requirements. What now?
Remember that when you become an administrator, you are expected to increase in activity and effectiveness. If you are granted adminship, you are expected to edit often and use your powers responsibly. You are expected to continue doing all of the above and more. This includes logging-on daily, responding to user reports, responding to messages or questions on your talk page, monitoring the recent changes, participating in wiki discussions, maintaining the front/Logopedia/MediaWiki pages, joining the administrator Discord chat room, and constructively utilizing administrator abilities. If your request is approved and you are inactive or caught abusing your powers, bureaucrats and/or Wikia staff members reserve the right to remove your rights and punish you accordingly.

I am prepared to do everything you just listed and more.
If you truly believe you are a fit to become an administrator, then we wish you luck! Be aware of how the requesting process works. This is a voting process. All users are permitted to vote, whether or not they are an administrator. They will either support, oppose, or comment. After a request is published, Logopedia editors have 2 months to vote. After the 2 months are up, a bureaucrat will review the votes and make a decision. If 2 months are up and a bureaucrat has not responded to a request, feel free to notify a bureaucrat on their talk page. You are not permitted whatsoever to edit in the support or oppose sections. You may add or reply to comments, but you may not modify or remove others' comments. If you are caught trying to influence editors to vote or change their vote, your request will be disqualified. Cheating, incivility, and harassment is prohibited. The Instructions section below will guide you on how to publish a request.

Instructions for Requesting[]

Please ensure you have read the above section. Anyone requesting must have a valid reason to why they should be promoted, and understand how to use the abilities. Use the code below to request. Fill in each parameter with what is specified (except the "Request" and "~~~~" part, leave that alone). Remember that these abilities are not given out freely or carelessly, and that they are not for fun. If your request is ignored or rejected, do not feel bad. Take the voters' advice and begin to work harder so you can request again in the future.

Code for Requesters:

{{Request|Username|Reason as to why you should be an administrator|~~~~}}
===Support===
===Oppose===
===Comments===

Example

When typing:
{{Request|User|Because...|~~~~}}
===Support===
===Oppose===
===Comments===

The following would appear:

User[]

Talk · Contributions · All logs · Block log · Upload log · User rights log · User rights management
Because... --User

Support[]

Oppose[]

Comments[]

Note to Voters[]

All users are able to vote, but may only vote once per request. Please note that if a request has already been approved/rejected by a bureaucrat, you are no longer able to vote. In the Support section, users should state why the user should earn the abilities and sign. In the Oppose section, users should state why the user should not earn the abilities and sign. In the Comments section, users may engage in further discussion regarding promotion.

Archived Requests

Request Archives
Current
1234567

Current Requests

Plue735[]

Talk · Contributions · All logs · Block log · Upload log · User rights log · User rights management
Recently I began feeling pity for the wiki as many of its pages suffer in quality, although I know I am able to contribute a lot even if not an admin, it just does not solve the entirety of the problems. This stems from my genuine and persistent care for the well-being of the wiki (including the community) as well as myself being a long-time editor. plue735 16:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Symbol wait
This request expires on 10 August 2024.
Once this request expires, no more votes or comments are permitted. Any edits made to this request following this request's expiration will be removed and/or will have no impact on the final decision.

Support[]

  • I'm really looking forward to your adminship request. You've been here for more than 10 years at this point and while you aren't as active as some other users I think you're fit for the admin role. Hope to see you work with us one day! TNG9009 2023TNGTalkTNGContribs 16:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • I have to agree with TNG here, and also I have to add, that I have seen your edits over the years, which were all solid and happened in good faith. In that case I would be happy to welcome you aboard to the team. Andor128-Wordmark-Logo-V2 (talk) 16:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Although I don't see you reporting users here, I still think you will be confident enough to become an administrator. I also really appreciate your effort in the editing you did here, and for being here for over a decade. ItsBartosz Logo Apr2024ItsBartosz Talk Signature Apr2024ItsBartosz Contributions Signature Apr2024 16:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Not sure why you "pity" Logopedia, I believe it is rather organised on the most part, yet I believe you would be an excellent admin as you are proactive and experienced, and the wiki will be even better with your help. Personal-logo-dec-2020-wordmark Personal-logo-dec-2020-talk-page Personal-logo-dec-2020-my-edits 10:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
  • After consideration over the past week, I have decided to support this request. Like TeNNiS-bAll-2835, I personally feel like you could have requested in a less negative tone, but you clearly have been around for a long time and seem to know the ins and outs of the wiki. NYC101 11:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Oppose[]

Comments[]

Symbol question Question. What will you do specifically to help with these problems? You claim there are problems, and while we don't necessarily disagree that the wiki is not perfect, do you have any solutions? If you answer that question, I may make my decision based off that. NYC101 16:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Most problems could be fixed by the need to clean various pages up. Many others would agree with this and state the same, but I don't always see progress in remaining committed to keeping the cleanliness of the affected pages itself. I don't want to sound self-centered or patriotic, but my primary concern (and the one I have "specialized" at the most) are /Other pages of (primarily Serbian) television channels of which most look kind of messed up, usually through redundant images (such as multiple similar frames from the same ident), ident and logo mockups (against the wiki rules). I have also witnessed a fluctuation of pages with non-notable content, such as hair salons, and owing to wiki guidelines, I have a natural feel to take care of that in the best way possible. Hope that this can also serve as a warning to other pages whose appearance or content is close to these, either in quality or notability of the subjects itself. The rest of the problems could be dealt with through primarily the contributors themselves. plue735 17:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Advertisement