I wonder why you removed the new Facebook, Inc. page for being "not necessary"? It was intended to distinguish the existing Facebook social network logo page with the recently-launched separate corporate logo.
I'm sorry, but it didn't look that way to me. Their were old logo from the website on the page and I moved one of the Facebook, Inc. logos to the Facebook page. That's why it was "not necessary." I don't see why Logopedia needs two pages for Facebook the website and Facebook the corporation. If you want recreate the Facebook, Inc. page, please don't add the old Facebook logos pre-FB,Inc.
Yeah, to be honest, that was i didn't agree either (about the old FB logos on the new page). That's why i removed all pre-2019-corporate FB logos and left only the new one.
But, i think the separate page is really needed to distinguish the corporate logos because they might have different histories (e.g. the company took the one of its famous brands, let's say WildBrain or Danone). And some of them might have slightly different features or didn't share the common elements at all. In this case, i really thought the new FB, Inc. corporate logo would be much better alone than being put on the existing Facebook page.